TheBlog

On Matters of Your Health & Your Community

Find me on LinkedIn at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/drrobertargyelan

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/drrobertargyelan

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Have your teenage children not use Cheech & Chong as their role models...a New Zealand study demonstrates that adolescent pot smoking leads to having a lower IQ.

Heavy Pot Use Tied to IQ Drop

 
By John Gever, Senior Editor, MedPage Today
Published: August 27, 2012
 
Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
 
 
Individuals repeatedly diagnosed with cannabis dependence during young adulthood had noticeable declines in IQ scores by age 38, especially when the heavy use started in their teens, researchers said.
 

A small to medium decline in mean IQ between tests taken on the eve of adolescence and again at age 38 was seen in those diagnosed at least three times with cannabis dependence, according to Madeline Meier, PhD, of Duke University, and colleagues, who reported on data from 1,037 participants in a New Zealand birth cohort.

In the small group of participants who became cannabis dependent before age 18 -- a total of 23 cohort members -- the decline translated to an average of about 8 IQ points, whereas 14 participants who also showed heavy cannabis use but only beginning in adulthood showed only a very small drop in full-scale scores (P=0.02), Meier and colleagues indicated online in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The researchers also reported that the size of the mean decline increased with the number of cannabis dependence diagnoses that participants had received in five evaluations conducted from ages 18 to 38 (P<0.0001 for trend).

"Collectively, [the study's] findings are consistent with speculation that cannabis use in adolescence, when the brain is undergoing critical development, may have neurotoxic effects," Meier and colleagues wrote.

Study participants were members of the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. It attempted to track all children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, from April 1972 to March 1973 starting at age 3. At age 38, the investigators had data on IQ testing and cannabis dependence diagnoses on 874 cohort members.

Besides assessing cannabis use, the five structured interviews in adulthood also elicited information on use of other illicit drugs and alcohol. IQ tests were conducted initially at ages 7 to 13 and again at age 38.

Among participants included in the current analysis, 242 never reported cannabis use in the structured interviews nor were they ever diagnosed with dependence; 479 indicated some use but never received a diagnosis; and 80, 35, and 38 had received one, two, or three or more dependence diagnoses in the adult evaluations.

Baseline mean IQ scores were similar and close to the standardized population average of 100 in these cannabis-use subgroups. However, at age 38, the mean scores had diverged considerably. The change from baseline was as follows (P values not reported):
  • Never used, never diagnosed: +0.80
  • Used, never diagnosed: -1.07
  • One diagnosis: -1.62
  • Two diagnoses: -2.47
  • Three or more diagnoses: -5.75
Meier and colleagues reported other changes over time in "standard deviation units," in which changes of 0.20, 0.50, and 0.80 should be considered small, medium, or large, respectively.

For participants with three or more diagnoses, the change was -0.38 units.

The researchers also stratified participants into two groups according to whether, at a given interview, they reported using cannabis at least once a week on average ("regular user").

Individuals classed as regular users at least three times in the study also showed the largest declines in IQ between tests (mean -5.23 IQ points, -0.35 standard deviation units, P value not reported), whereas little change was seen in those never reporting regular use.

Similar patterns were seen in IQ subdomain scores.

These small to medium declines were also seen in this participant group in tests of memory, processing speed, and executive function.

Meier and colleagues sought to rule out potential confounding factors, taking educational attainment and use of alcohol and other drugs into account.

When they restricted their analysis to 278 participants who did not get beyond high school, again those with three or more dependence diagnoses showed medium-level declines in IQ (mean -0.48 standard deviation units) whereas those in the never-used, never-diagnosed category had essentially no change (mean -0.03 units, P=0.0009 for trend).

The pattern also held up when the researchers excluded participants with persistent dependence on tobacco, alcohol, and "hard" drugs, and also those with diagnoses of schizophrenia.

However, the strongest relationships between persistent dependence and IQ decline applied to those who began heavy use in adolescence. Meier and colleagues suggested that, actually, the relationship between dependence and IQ decline may be entirely driven by this group.

The 23 participants with adolescent-onset dependence and at least three diagnoses overall showed a mean decline of about 0.53 standard deviation units, compared with a drop of about 0.13 among those with three diagnoses that all came during adulthood (P=0.02).

Nonsignificant trends toward greater declines in IQ were also seen in those teen-onset dependence but fewer total diagnoses of dependence.

"In fact, adult-onset cannabis users did not appear to experience IQ decline as a function of persistent cannabis use," Meier and colleagues wrote.

They cautioned that their data did not prove that heavy cannabis use actually caused the decline. "There may be some unknown 'third' variable that could account for the findings. The data also cannot reveal the mechanism underlying the association between persistent cannabis dependence and neuropsychological decline," they wrote.

They also acknowledged that their data relied on self-report of cannabis use, without confirmation from blood or urine testing.

But these caveats did not stop them from speculating on causal mechanisms and the implications of a causal relationship.

Meier and colleagues noted that animal studies as well as theories of neural development during adolescence support a neurotoxic effect of cannabis in the young adult brain.

Moreover, they argued, their findings should inform public health programs.

"Prevention and policy efforts should focus on delivering to the public the message that cannabis use during adolescence can have harmful effects on neuropsychological functioning, delaying the onset of cannabis use at least until adulthood, and encouraging cessation of cannabis use particularly for those who began using cannabis in adolescence," they wrote.

Duke University, in a press release, was even less circumspect in a press release headlined, "Adolescent pot use leaves lasting mental deficits."

Its first sentence claimed that "the persistent, dependent use of marijuana before age 18 has been shown to cause lasting harm to a person's intelligence, attention and memory" in the study.

The Dunedin cohort study was funded by the New Zealand Health Research Council. The current analysis was supported by the U.K. Medical Research Council, the U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the Jacobs Foundation.
No potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Primary source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Source reference:
Meier M, et al "Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife" Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206820109.
Posted by Dr. Robert Argyelan at 6:52 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Friday, August 24, 2012

Do you like to believe that there is sufficient research and evidence for every procedure performed in healthcare? Think again. ....and ask yourself if you'd follow through with a procedure if you learned there was no evidence to support it. Or worse, how would you feel learning that fact after you've already had the procedure?

New York Times

Op-Ed Contributor

Testing What We Think We Know

By H. GILBERT WELCH
Published: August 19, 2012 Hanover, N.H.
Leigh Guldig

BY 1990, many doctors were recommending hormone replacement therapy to healthy middle-aged women and P.S.A. screening for prostate cancer to older men. Both interventions had become standard medical practice. 

But in 2002, a randomized trial showed that preventive hormone replacement caused more problems (more heart disease and breast cancer) than it solved (fewer hip fractures and colon cancer). Then, in 2009, trials showed that P.S.A. screening led to many unnecessary surgeries and had a dubious effect on prostate cancer deaths. 

How would you have felt — after over a decade of following your doctor’s advice — to learn that high-quality randomized trials of these standard practices had only just been completed? And that they showed that both did more harm than good? Justifiably furious, I’d say. Because these practices affected millions of Americans, they are locked in a tight competition for the greatest medical error on record. 

The problem goes far beyond these two. The truth is that for a large part of medical practice, we don’t know what works. But we pay for it anyway. Our annual per capita health care expenditure is now over $8,000. Many countries pay half that — and enjoy similar, often better, outcomes. Isn’t it time to learn which practices, in fact, improve our health, and which ones don’t? 

To find out, we need more medical research. But not just any kind of medical research. Medical research is dominated by research on the new: new tests, new treatments, new disorders and new fads. But above all, it’s about new markets. 

We don’t need to find more things to spend money on; we need to figure out what’s being done now that is not working. That’s why we have to start directing more money toward evaluating standard practices — all the tests and treatments that doctors are already providing. 

There are many places to start. Mammograms are increasingly finding a microscopic abnormality called D.C.I.S., or ductal carcinoma in situ. Currently we treat it as if it were invasive breast cancer, with surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Some doctors think this is necessary, others don’t. The question is relevant to more than 60,000 women each year. Don’t you think we should know the answer? 

Or how about this one: How should we screen for colon cancer? The standard approach, fecal occult blood testing, is simple and cheap. But more and more Americans are opting for colonoscopy — over four million per year in Medicare alone. It’s neither simple nor cheap. In terms of the technology and personnel involved, it’s more like going to the operating room. (I know, I’ve had one.) Which is better? We don’t know. 

Let me be clear, answering questions like these is not easy. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program is in fact preparing to take on the colonoscopy versus fecal occult blood testing question. The trial, which will involve up to 50,000 patients, will last a decade and surely cost millions of dollars. 

Research like this takes more than grant money. For starters, it takes a research infrastructure that monitors what standard practice is — data on what’s actually happening across the country. Because of Medicare, we have a clear view for patients age 65 and older, but it’s a lot cloudier for those under 65. Basic questions like how common annual physical exams are and what testing is part of them are unanswerable. 

It also takes a research culture that promotes a healthy skepticism toward standard medical practice. That requires physician researchers who know what standard practice is, have the imagination to question it and the skills to study it. These doctors need training that’s not yet part of any medical school curriculum; they need mentoring of senior researchers; and they need some assurance that investigating accepted treatments can be a viable option, instead of career suicide. 

We have to move quickly. The administrative demands of clinical care, on one side, and the competition for research funding on the other, make it increasingly difficult for researchers to see patients. They become isolated from standard practice, and their ability to study it diminishes. Clinicians who are well positioned to study these issues are increasingly directed toward enhancing productivity — questions about how can we do this better, faster or more consistently — instead of questions about whether the practices are warranted in the first place. 

Here’s a simple idea to turn this around: devote 1 percent of health care expenditures to evaluating what the other 99 percent is buying. Distribute the research dollars to match the clinical dollars. Figure out what works and what doesn’t. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (created as part of the Affordable Care Act to study the comparative effectiveness of different treatments) is supposed to tackle questions of direct relevance to patients and could take on this role, but its budget — less than 0.03 percent of total spending — is far from sufficient. 

A call for more medical research might sound like pablum. Worse, coming from a medical researcher, it might sound like self-interest (cut me some slack, that’s another one of our standard practices). But I don’t need the money. The system does. Or if you prefer, we can continue to argue about who pays for what — without knowing what’s worth paying for. 

H. Gilbert Welch, a professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, is a co-author of “Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health.”
Posted by Dr. Robert Argyelan at 7:06 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Monday, August 20, 2012

If you're thinking of moving to another country in your last few years in order to extend your life, you'd clearly be better off changing your lifestyle now - including your eating habits - in order to live a longer and healthier life.

Other Nations Still Top U.S. in Life Expectancy

 
By David Pittman, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today
Published: August 19, 2012
 
 

WASHINGTON -- Although Americans are living longer than before, their life expectancies still lag behind those of other countries, a government report found.

For example, Japanese women age 65 could expect to live 3.7 years longer than American women of the same age, while Japanese men age 65 live 1.3 years longer than U.S. men, according to the report, which was issued Thursday by the National Institute on Aging.

The report, "Older Americans 2012: Key Indicators of Well-Being," tracks trends in those older than 65 in categories ranging from health to housing to economics.

The report also found that obesity rates continued to rise, and the condition persists as a major cause of premature death for older people. In 2009 to 2010, 38% of people 65 and older were obese. That's up from 1988 to 1994, when 22% were obese.

Other findings included:
  • Death rates for heart disease and stroke declined by nearly 50% since 1981, but chronic lower respiratory disease increased by 57%.
  • Hospice care use in the final 30 days of life jumped to 43% in 2009 from 19% in 1999.
  • More older people are dying at home (24% in 2009 versus 15% in 1999) rather than in hospitals (32% in 2009 versus 49% in 1999).
  • Women reported higher levels of arthritis than men (56% versus 45%, respectively), while men reported higher levels of heart disease (37% versus 26%).
In addition, more Americans 65 and older are enrolling in health maintenance organizations and other Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, and they also are spending more money out-of-pocket on healthcare, the report found. In 2009, 28% of Medicare beneficiaries were enrolled in an MA program, up from 16% in 2005.

Out-of-pocket spending for health care services among the poor and near-poor elderly increased to 22% of income in 2009 -- up from 12% three decades ago.

"However, average healthcare costs did not increase further between 2006 and 2008, after adjusting for inflation," according to the study.

3 comments


Dr. Gregory E. Johnson, D. C.
08/20/12

I have witnessed more & more Dis- Ease in my 31 years of practice. More & more patients who are taking way too much medication and more & more patients are having serious side effects from the medications/surgeries/procedures that are being utilized in our, "Modern" high tech Medical Model. The US has one of the most costly healthcare systems in the world, according to, the World Health Organization (WHO). According to the WHO, the United States spent more on healthcare per capita ($7,146), and more on healthcare as percentage of its GDP (15.2%), than any other nation in 2008. Medical debt is one of the leading causes of personal bankruptcies, yet lags behind other wealthy nations in such measures as Infant mortality and life expectancy. According to Wikipedia, In the United States life expectancy in 42nd in the world. My hope and prayer is that, people start focusing on "Staying Healthy", rather than being Sick..

joseph de luca
08/20/12

I concur with Varian Keller, it is likely life style. But in my case, stopping smoking some years ago after smoking since age 12 to age 45 was my decision not the government. Just as getting my weight down from 205 to it's present 140 was my decision. It's up to the government to inform us with nutrition labels etc, but it's up to us as individual to get off our butts and do what needs to be done. The government should be involved in better and cheaper health care, promoting a sustainable existence, interstate highways, air traffic control etc but to dictate our foods and exercise is an individual responsibility. Perhaps physicians could further help by being examples of good health as are mine which include marathon runners, triathletes, long distance cyclists and mountain bikers. As they have told me, "no excuses Joe, get off your ass, workout and eat healthy and organic wherever possible. If I can do it with a full-time practice, a family and volunteer work in the community so too can you". Sustainability is where it's at both in the environment and our lifestyles..

varian keller
08/19/12

I've spent a little time in urban and rural Japan and, like most other countries with greater longevity than the USA, and contrary to the tone of this article, their lifestyle not the economics of their health care system is the root of the differences noted in this article. Based on this the likes of the mayor of NYC would better serve us by not confining government control to our access to super-sized soft drinks and infant formula but rather target the US way of life in general (no doubt their goal anyway)..
Posted by Dr. Robert Argyelan at 6:46 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Can meditation be of benefit to you and your health? According to an article published in Neurology Now, there are studies demonstrating it indeed is of help.

Neurology Now:
August-september 2012 - Volume 8 - Issue 4 - p 30–33
doi: 10.1097/01.NNN.0000418730.21607.7d
Features: Meditation

Meditation as Medicine

Paturel, Amy M.S., M.P.H.

Abstract

 

Scientific evidence from well-designed studies shows that meditation can increase attention span, sharpen focus, improve memory, and dull the perception of pain.

In the spring of 2000, Cassandra Metzger was working as an attorney at the PBS headquarters in Washington, D.C., attending night classes for a master's degree at Johns Hopkins University, and training for her first 10K race. At 34 years of age, her life was full and fast. But during that spring and into the summer, she became unable to get out of bed because of unexplained pain and fatigue. By the fall, she had to stop working.

A year later, Metzger was diagnosed with fibromyalgia, a disorder of the central nervous system that seems to distort the body's normal response to pain. Some researchers believe fibromyalgia causes pain signals to misfire.

Metzger was prescribed painkillers, muscle relaxers, sleep drugs, mood stabilizers, and other medications to manage her pain, insomnia, fatigue, and resulting depression. None of these worked very well. Then she discovered meditation, an ancient practice of focused attention designed to silence the brain's default thought patterns and increase awareness of the present moment.

“Meditation saved me from despair more than once,” Metzger says. “During episodes of acute illness, I was saved by knowing that the experience of pain was just one moment in time—maybe an excruciating moment, maybe a long moment, but still a moment. I learned this by meditating. The concept of impermanence—that everything passes away—may seem scary, but for someone who is vomiting from a pain medication on which she pinned every last hope, impermanence is a beacon.” (See box, “Meditation: The Basics.”)

Meditation: The Basics

 

Meditation has aptly been described as “thinking about not thinking,” ideally for 20 minutes or more every day. During this uninterrupted time, you calmly become aware of your thoughts and distance yourself from those thoughts. It's normal for your mind to wander. When that happens, as it inevitably will, gently detach from the distracting thoughts and bring your attention back to your breathing, a word, prayer, or an object.

Meditation is not completely risk-free. It can unearth fear, trauma, or painful memories for some people, particularly those who have psychotic disorders, severe depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder. “These individuals should only meditate under the supervision of a mental health provider or experienced meditation teacher,” says Katherine MacLean, Ph.D., of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

While there are many different types of meditation, here are a few of the most common:

* ATTENTION MEDITATION: Sit on a cushion or chair with your back straight and your hands in your lap. Then concentrate your mind on a focal point, such as your breath, an internal image, or a burning candle. If your mind starts to wander, gently bring your attention back to the focus of meditation. Over time, this practice will train the mind to watch out for distractions, “let go” of them once they arise, and refocus when necessary.

* MINDFULNESS MEDITATION: The aim in this form of meditation, which has origins in Buddhism, is to monitor various experiences of your mind—thoughts, feelings, perceptions, and sensations—and simply observe them as they arise and pass rather than trying to interact with them or change them. The idea is to maintain a detached awareness, without judgment, to become more aware and in touch with your body, your life, and your surroundings.

* PASSAGE MEDITATION: Passage meditation involves reciting a short passage (prayer, mantra, or short poem) silently to yourself over and over and over again. The meaning of the words is not the most important element—most importantly, the words are a focal point for attention. “Passage meditation is great for beginners since it's hard to maintain distracting thoughts when you have a verbal anchor,” says Dr. MacLean.

* BENEVOLENT MEDITATION: Benevolent meditation generates beneficial states of mind for yourself and others. A common approach is to repeat: “May I be happy. May I be free of suffering. May I be healthy. May I live with ease.” Then repeat the same passage focusing your attention on someone you love, then on a stranger, then on an enemy, and then on all creatures. “People with chronic illnesses often experience a lot of self-loathing and self-blame,” says David Vago, Ph.D., of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital. “If you can transform those negative emotions toward yourself into compassion and love, it not only benefits you, it also benefits everyone around you.”

NOW AND ZEN

 

Metzger's experience isn't unique. Millions of people all over the world claim that meditation transformed their lives. But for centuries, only anecdotal reports about these benefits were available as proof. Now, scientific evidence from well-designed studies—including images of the brain—is emerging. Some of these studies suggest that meditating for as little as 20 minutes daily can affect the function and structure of the brain in a positive way. Researchers have found that meditation increases attention span, sharpens focus, improves memory, and dulls the perception of pain.

“Physical changes in brain structure convince most skeptics that the benefits of meditation go beyond the placebo effect,” says neurologist Alexander Mauskop, M.D., director of the New York Headache Center, associate professor of neurology at the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology, and author of “Nonmedication, Alternative, and Complementary Treatments for Migraine,” upcoming in the AAN's journal Continuum. The placebo effect is the benefit that a person derives from his or her positive expectations of a treatment rather than from the treatment itself.

During the past 20 years, scientists have shown great interest in studying how and why meditation works. In 1998, a search of the medical literature using the key words “mindfulness meditation” would bring up only 11 scientific studies, compared to more than 560 today, according to David Vago, Ph.D., instructor at Harvard Medical School and associate psychologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA.

YOUR BRAIN ON MEDITATION

 

This surge in research is a byproduct of neurologists' discovery that meditation produces measurable changes in the brain, say experts. For example, in a 2011 study published in the medical journal Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, researchers found that people who participated in an eight-week mindfulness meditation program experienced increased density in brain regions associated with memory, one's sense of self, empathy, and stress response.

Previous studies uncovered a thickening of both gray matter (the parts of the brain involved with thoughts and emotions) and white matter (the parts of the brain that connect different gray matter regions) among meditators compared to people who don't meditate regularly. While scientists aren't clear what these changes mean, they suspect that thickening gray and white matter is associated with the ability to process information more efficiently.

Meditation may even buffer the aging brain. “When researchers compared the brains of normal aging adults and same-age serious meditators, they found that the brains of the meditators did not shrink. What we accept as a normal process—the shrinking of the brain as you get older—may not be necessarily normal,” says Dr. Mauskop.

INNOVATIVE THERAPIES
 
This is the seventh in a series of regular articles covering complementary therapies. Also known as alternative therapies, they are now being tested by researchers to augment standard medical treatments.

More recently, meditation researchers have investigated how meditation impacts what they call the brain's default mode network (DMN), which includes the self-talk that constantly chatters in the background as you go about your day. According to Katherine MacLean, Ph.D., a researcher in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore, MD, the brain regions involved in the DMN include the medial prefrontal cortex (front middle part of the brain) and the posterior cingulate cortex (back middle part of the brain).

For most of us, the DMN tends to focus on the past or the future instead of the present moment. For example, we may be vaguely aware of thoughts looping through our consciousness, such as “Why did I just say something so stupid?” or “I have so much work to do this week” or “I can't remember when I wasn't in so much pain, and it will probably never stop.”

Since such self-talk is a well-known distraction in the context of meditation, successful meditators might be better equipped to control the DMN. A recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study revealed shorter neural responses in regions of the DMN of meditators compared to non-meditators, suggesting that meditating on a regular basis enhances the ability to limit negative self-talk such as dwelling on past mistakes or imagining problems in the future, allowing instead for meditators to stay in the now.

Researchers suspect that less DMN activity enables the brain to rest and remap itself. “Shutting your brain off for portions of the day—for example, through meditation—may be a very healthy activity for your brain over the long term,” says Dr. Mauskop.

PAIN AND THE MEDITATING BRAIN

 

People with a chronic, painful illness such as fibromyalgia may feel alienated from or betrayed by their own bodies. They may also feel estranged from family and friends as a result of their illness. In Metzger's case, meditation helped her stay in touch with her body and her loved ones.

“I learned to continue to inhabit my body rather than try to flee from it,” she says. “And meditation helped my relationships in terms of accepting what is and letting go of my expectations of other people.” Metzger even had experiences where her pain vanished during a meditation session. “It didn't happen all the time, but the fact that it happened at all was astonishing to me, especially after nine months of unsuccessfully trying to relieve my pain with drugs,” she adds.

Several studies confirm that people who meditate regularly experience less pain than those who don't meditate. Fadel Zeidan, Ph.D., a researcher at Wake Forest School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, NC, reported in a study in the Journal of Neuroscience in 2011 that newbie meditators showed a 40-percent reduction in pain intensity and a 57-percent reduction in pain unpleasantness after just a few short sessions of mindfulness meditation training. Although the researchers didn't directly test for this, meditation produced a greater pain reduction than morphine, which typically reduces pain by about 25 percent.

In another study, Dr. Zeidan and his colleagues found that 20-minute meditation sessions for just three days helped a small group of volunteers significantly reduce their sensitivity to mild electric shocks—even when they weren't meditating at the moment of shock. “Mindfulness meditation alters the way people experience pain,” says Dr. Zeidan. “It teaches you to look at each moment and with appreciation, even when that moment includes pain.”

Researchers say that meditators still sense discomfort, but they have discovered how to effectively manage their emotional response to pain. Indeed, meditators who experience distress while in a meditative state show greater activity in areas related to body awareness, such as the anterior insula and somatosensory cortex.

“They're actually more in tune with the sensation of pain, but they don't have their usual emotional reaction to it,” explains Dr. MacLean.

Instead, meditators learn to recognize emotions such as pain, fear, or anger, without giving into the pessimistic thoughts or chain of behaviors that habitually follow. Non-meditators, on the other hand, tend to get stuck focusing on the negative emotions, as Dr. Vago has found in his research. People with fibromyalgia, for example, have a tendency to dwell on thoughts about pain because they experience chronic pain, usually every day. “When they see a word like ‘throbbing' or ‘pounding' show up on a computer screen, they detect it quickly and avoid it,” says Dr. Vago of his research.

“If the word is on the screen long enough to process it on a conscious level, they begin to ruminate,” he adds. On the plus side, Dr. Vago's team found that after eight weeks of meditation, those tendencies were gone.

“When you're dealing with acute pain, thinking about how horrible the future will be can be even more powerful than the pain itself,” says Dr. Vago. “The pain network turns on in anticipation of discomfort, and only when the pain comes does it finally turn off. Actually experiencing the pain can almost feel like a release.”

Rather than engaging the fight-or-flight response of the sympathetic nervous system in anticipation of pain and trying to escape it, meditators learn to accept the sensation of pain. Once they do, pain no longer grips their minds. It becomes another experience that comes and goes.

“Even if the discomfort doesn't go away completely, meditation opens a gap between pain and me,” says Metzger. “Instead of the pain acting like a vise that grips my spinal cord, it will kind of float in my body. And often, that's enough of a relief.”

MEDITATING MECHANICS

 

The great thing about meditation is anyone can do it, anywhere. It doesn't require special equipment, a gym membership, or an advanced degree. Practitioners simply focus on a sound, object, mantra, or their breath. The point is just to shut everything else out.

“Meditation is the simplest technique in the world,” says Dr. Mauskop, “but that doesn't mean it's easy to do.” In fact, staying with a painful sensation or experience can be mind-numbingly difficult (pun intended). Fortunately, you don't need the discipline of a Tibetan monk to experience the benefits. The key, Dr. Mauskop says, is to approach the practice of meditation with curiosity and without judgment, accepting what is true in that moment—including the fact that meditation can be difficult. Instead of trying to change your experience—“Why can't I meditate better and not feel in pain?”—you simply become aware of your desire to change it.

MIROSLAW OSLIZLOISTO...
MIROSLAW OSLIZLOISTO...

According to Metzger, each day is different, and you can't always replicate a positive experience. “There are times when I'm in such agony that I can't meditate on my own,” she says. “During those times, I don't worry about sitting in a particular position. I just lie on my bed and put on a CD with a guided meditation—one specifically about pain—and that usually helps.” (See Resource Central, page 49, for books and CDs on meditation.)

The goal, say experts, is to focus your attention. “You don't even have to be in a sitting position to meditate,” says Dr. Vago. “You can be standing in the grocery line. If you're getting frustrated, just move your awareness to your breath. It's that simple.” He also suggests taking three breaths in a sitting position before getting out of bed. “It's amazing how something that subtle can change the experience through your day.”

While research hasn't yet pinpointed how much time is required to achieve benefits, experts say practicing even 5 to 10 minutes daily can help. The novices in Dr. Zeidan's studies reported less pain with 20-minute practices. In a second experiment, he found that similarly brief sessions improve cognitive performance on tasks that demand continuous attention.

“It's hard to imagine the structure of the brain could shift after a little more than an hour of meditation training over three days,” says Dr. MacLean. “But on a psychological level, simply being able to take a different perspective on pain has all sorts of immediate benefits.”

Perspective can have powerful effects. Viewing illness as a battle to be won, for example, may set some people up for failure, particularly when a chronic illness has such a strong presence that it can't be defeated.

“I learned in meditation to breath in the physical sensation of pain and accept it in the most profound way, which depleted some of its power and hold. Without the practice of meditation I never could have done that. It never would have even occurred to me to try.”

After 12 years, meditating can still be challenging and counterintuitive for Metzger. “I have learned not to fight my experience, but to accept it and breathe into my pain,” she says. “During long hauls of illness—weeks of being in bed, alone, isolated, falling into despair—meditation creates a space for hope to creep in.” And that can make all the difference.

©2012 American Academy of Neurology
Posted by Dr. Robert Argyelan at 4:53 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Let's step it up....more people are walking then ever before but they're taking less time to do so. Walking is great for your health, so if you're not yet doing so, work up to taking a 15 minute walk each day.

Americans Step Up Their Walking

By Kristina Fiore, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: August 07, 2012
 
 

More Americans are walking for physical fitness now than they were 5 years ago, but they spend less time doing so, government researchers said.

Between 2005 and 2010, the proportion of the population that reported walking at least 10 minutes a day rose from 55.7% to 62%, Dianna Carroll, PhD, of the CDC, and colleagues reported in a Vital Signs report in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

But the mean time spent walking daily fell from 15 minutes (105 minutes per week) to 13 minutes (90.8 minutes) during that time, the reasons for which are unclear, the researchers wrote.

Still, walking is a "wonder drug" that can prevent a variety of maladies from diabetes to cancer, CDC director Tom Frieden, MD, MPH, said during a phone call with reporters.

"I would say there's no single drug that can do anything like what regular physical activity does," Frieden said.

The data come from the CDC's 2005 and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys, and Frieden said the increase in walking prevalence was seen across almost all demographic groups.

Yet only 48% of Americans are meeting 2008 guidelines that recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, such as brisk walking, per week, and a third of Americans said they don't get any physical activity at all.

Walking appeared to increase the likelihood that patients met those recommendations, Frieden said. In 2010, 59.5% of those who walked met the guideline compared with 29.5% of those who didn't walk.

In adjusted analyses, walkers were nearly three times more likely to meet the guidelines than nonwalkers (adjusted OR 2.95, 95% CI 2.73 to 3.19), and the association was significant for men (aOR=2.64) and women (aOR=3.46).

Frieden urged communities and employers to foster programs that would encourage people to get out and walk. State and local governments should consider walking during community planning by including pathways and designing streets and roadways that are safe for pedestrians, he said, while employers can create walking programs and identify nearby walking paths for their employees.

"Walking is possible for just about everyone," Frieden said. "It doesn't require special skills. You can use it to get places and to do things." In fact, among adults who required walking assistance, approximately one in four reported walking and meeting the activity guidelines, according to the Vital Signs report.

It's important that people pick an activity they like to do so that they'll stick with it, Frieden added. "You have to build it into your regular routine and make it a part of your life," he advised.

The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.



Primary source: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
Source reference:
Berrigan D, et al "Vital Signs: Walking among adults -- United States, 2005 and 2010" MMWR 2012; 61: 1-7.
Posted by Dr. Robert Argyelan at 7:15 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Spine Healthcare (click on image)

Spine Healthcare (click on image)

About Me

My photo
Dr. Robert Argyelan
Right brain/left brain... analysis and creativity... Dr. Argyelan employs his background in the arts and sciences to explore the human spine and its expressions of life, the conditions that effect it, and the current state of healthcare for it and other matters involving your well-being.
View my complete profile

On neck pain and what to do about it (click on image)

On neck pain and what to do about it (click on image)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2016 (5)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2015 (69)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2014 (71)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2013 (83)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ▼  2012 (73)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ▼  August (5)
      • Have your teenage children not use Cheech & Chong ...
      • Do you like to believe that there is sufficient re...
      • If you're thinking of moving to another country in...
      • Can meditation be of benefit to you and your healt...
      • Let's step it up....more people are walking then e...
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2011 (66)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (13)

Total Pageviews

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments

Let's Talk About It....

Its said 80% of the population will suffer from back pain....so let's talk about it. Chiropractic, acupuncture, surgery, nutrition, and more. What works, what doesn't. What's new, what's irrelevant.

Search Box

Dr. Robert David Argyelan. Awesome Inc. theme. Theme images by Maliketh. Powered by Blogger.