Monday, March 31, 2014

For women, a new study provides evidence that protein intake before exercise leads to a more effective burning of calories. But there's a caveat too...high protein intake without exercise can lead to muscle loss.

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Protein followed by exercise is recipe for calorie-burning success in some women

Date:
March 24, 2014
Source:
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Summary:

New research shows that for some women, a high-protein meal followed by 30 minutes of moderate exercise is an effective way of burning calories, especially when compared to exercising on an empty stomach. The goal of the study was to determine the interaction between the thermic effect of food and exercise on the body’s total energy expenditure, as measured in calories. Thermic effect is the amount of energy that it takes to digest, store and utilize the food we eat.
 


University of Arkansas graduate student Ashley Binns (left) and Michelle Gray, an assistant professor of kinesiology, collaborated on a study that found for some women, a high-protein meal followed by moderate exercise is an effective way of burning calories.  Credit: Russell Cothren, University of Arkansas



New research shows that for some women, a high-protein meal followed by 30 minutes of moderate exercise is an effective way of burning calories, especially when compared to exercising on an empty stomach.




Exercise scientists at the University of Arkansas describe their findings in a study that has been accepted by the Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, with the title, “Thermic effect of food, exercise, and total energy expenditure in active females.”

Ashley Binns, a doctoral student in kinesiology and exercise science who led the study, said the goal was to determine the interaction between the thermic effect of food and exercise on the body’s total energy expenditure, as measured in calories. Thermic effect is the amount of energy that it takes to digest, store and utilize the food we eat.

“We looked at the effects of protein consumption alone on total energy expenditure, and protein consumption combined with exercise,” Binns said. “We found that with exercise, there is a trend for a continued increase in caloric expenditure with higher protein consumption. Additionally, the consumption of the high- or low-protein meals resulted in greater energy expenditure than the fasted state. That means that eating prior to exercise does provide fuel to burn, making us more like an energy-burning machine.”

Binns co-authored the paper with her graduate adviser, Michelle Gray, an assistant professor of kinesiology, and Ro Di Brezzo, a University Professor of kinesiology.

“To my knowledge, this is the first study of its kind,” Gray said. “What Ashley found is important because of the growing problem of obesity in the United States. If simple changes can increase our energy expenditure, then they may have a large impact on weight loss or weight maintenance.”

Ten active college-age women of normal body weight participated in the study. For their testing sessions, they were given a high-protein meal, low-protein meal, or no food at all, before walking on a treadmill.

Binns selected these women because they were “recreationally active,” which meant that they normally exercised at least twice a week, but they weren’t athletes or severely overweight.

“Studies involving high-protein diets and low-protein diets have typically examined the extremes: athletic populations and morbidly obese individuals,” Binns said. “I wanted to see what the thermic effect of food was like for a normal individual, who didn’t have any metabolic disorders or medications that would affect their metabolism.”

Exercise was key to the study, Binns said, because high-protein diets without exercise can lead to muscle loss.

“With just a high-protein diet and no exercise, the body heats up to break down the protein but what also happens is it breaks down muscle,” she said. “You have individuals who are losing weight on a high-protein diet because their metabolism is increasing. The body first burns fat but then it also starts to burn muscle as fuel. We want to see individuals keep their muscle mass with a high-protein diet so that they are more energy efficient.”

Binns holds two bachelor’s degrees and a master’s degree, all from the U of A. As an undergraduate, she was a dual major in nutrition and kinesiology, with a concentration in fitness specialization.

She intends to apply findings from the thermic effect study — the results of which constituted her master’s thesis — to her current interests, which focus on aging research and education with an emphasis on the interactive effects of protein consumption and exercise to reduce the deleterious effects of sarcopenia, the loss of muscle mass and strength associated with age.


Story Source:
The above story is based on materials provided by University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Ashley Binns, Michelle Gray, Ro Di Brezzo. Thermic effect of food, exercise, and total energy expenditure in active females. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2014; DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.01.008

Monday, March 24, 2014

Knee surgeries - whether arthroscopic or replacement - is big business and on the rise. But simple warm-up exercises can help prevent such surgeries if performed regularly prior to your work out routine. You know what they say about an ounce of prevention...helps keep the surgeon away.


How a Warm-Up Routine Can Save Your Knees

Erik Isakson/Getty Images

Phys Ed
Phys Ed
Gretchen Reynolds on the science of fitness.

Rupturing an anterior cruciate ligament in the knee is a nightmare. As the parent of a teenage son who is seven months out from A.C.L. reconstruction surgery, I can attest to the physical and psychological toll it can take, not to mention the medical bills. But a practical new study suggests that changing how sports teams warm up before practices and games could substantially lower the risk that athletes will hurt a knee, at a cost of barely a dollar per player. 

Injuries to the A.C.L., which connects the tibia and femur and stabilizes the knee joint, are soaring, with an estimated 150,000 cases a year. The ligament is prone to tearing if the knee shears sideways during hard, awkward landings or abrupt shifts in direction – the kind of movements that are especially common in sports like basketball, football, soccer, volleyball and skiing. 

Motivated by the growing occurrence of these knee injuries, many researchers have been working in recent years to develop training programs to reduce their number. These programs, formally known as neuromuscular training, use a series of exercises to teach athletes how to land, cut, shift directions, plant their legs, and otherwise move during play so that they are less likely to injure themselves. 

Studies have found that the programs can reduce the number of A.C.L. tears per season by 50 percent or more, particularly among girls, who tear their A.C.L.s at a higher rate than boys do (although, numerically, far more boys are affected). 

But to date, few leagues, high schools or teams across the country have instituted neuromuscular training. That puzzled Dr. Eric Swart, a resident in orthopedic surgery at Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center.

Wondering what might motivate coaches and other interested parties to take up A.C.L. injury-prevention programs, Dr. Swart and his colleagues settled on naked self-interest. They set out to see what the financial savings involved in undertaking — or resisting — an A.C.L.-injury prevention program might be. 

So, for a study presented last Friday at the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons annual meeting in New Orleans, he and his colleagues gathered recent clinical trials related to neuromuscular training and used them to create a model of what would happen in a hypothetical sports league composed of male and female athletes, ages 14 to 22, if they did or did not practice neuromuscular training. The researchers then began running the monetary numbers.

They first determined that, not surprisingly, the medical costs associated with a single A.C.L. tear are staggering, with the estimated price for reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation averaging $15,000. If the incidence of A.C.L. tears is about 3 percent among athletes not practicing neuromuscular training, as the clinical trials showed, then, the researchers concluded, the cost of these injuries per player was quite high.

“In our model, it worked out to something like $500 per player,” Dr. Swart said. “Imagine if people collected that as a fee when kids signed up” for club soccer or basketball. 

However, neuromuscular training changed that calculus, he continued, dropping the likely incidence of the injuries to about 1.5 percent of the athletes. More important for this study, the cost of the training was negligible, since several of the programs included in the analysis are available free on the Internet and require almost no equipment. 

According to the researchers’ calculations, the cost of starting a neuromuscular training program averaged $1.25 per player per year, “which is so much cheaper than visiting an orthopedic surgeon,” said Dr. Swart, an orthopedic surgeon. The cost was the same whether the training was directed at both genders or only at girls.

Those parents and coaches who find that number enticing can begin neuromuscular training with their charges quite easily, Dr. Swart said. “Neuromuscular training is just a better way to warm up,” he said. 

Most of the scientifically studied programs consist of about 15 to 20 minutes of exercises including marching, jumping, squatting and side-to-side shuffling that, Dr. Swart said, “help to wake up the brain and nervous system” and get the entire body moving with sharper coordination. The programs also emphasize landing with knees bent and in the proper alignment. 

Among the most thoroughly studied neuromuscular training options are the PEP (Prevent Injury, Enhance Performance) program, which was developed by the Santa Monica Sports Medicine Foundation, and the FIFA 11 program, created by the international governing body of soccer. Both programs are free, and coaches need no training to teach them to athletes. 

It is important, though, that athletes perform the exercises correctly and in the order prescribed by the programs, Dr. Swart said, to avoid injuries during the training itself. You can find step-by-step, easy-to-follow videos of the workout routines for both the PEP program and the FIFA 11 program on each group’s website. (A sample video from each program can also be viewed below).

Dr. Swart and his colleagues also evaluated the cost-effectiveness of screening young athletes to find those whose biomechanics place them at especially high risk of tearing an A.C.L. and train only them. But the costs of screening were too high to make it practical for youth leagues or high schools.
Instead, Dr. Swart said, universal neuromuscular training for athletes involved in high-risk sports seemed to be cost-effective and to significantly reduce the chance that you will be visiting his office this season.

Monday, March 17, 2014

As a society, we experience what seems to be a lot of negativity going around. Government, local news, world news, etc all seem to be infected. But there's good news coming from a new study and we may be able to use the information to change our outlook. Happiness, it turns out, is viral!

Medical News Today -

Happiness is viral, thanks to social media

Sunday 16 March 2014 - 12am PST


Previous studies have shown that emotion spreads among people in direct, person-to-person contact. This "emotional contagion" has been documented among friends, acquaintances, and even among strangers.

But how successfully this contagion is mediated through online relationships is less well known.
The researchers behind the new study analyzed over a billion anonymized status updates from more than 100 million Facebook users. The users were drawn from the top 10 most populous US cities, and their Facebook updating occurred during a period of 1,180 days between January 2009 and March 2012.

However, the researchers did not read any of these social media messages. Instead, they used a piece of software called the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count that assessed the emotional content of each post for them.

Using the randomness of weather to test cause and effect


As any regular users of Facebook will know, the state of the day's weather can have an across-board effect on the mood of your contacts. The researchers noticed that rainy weather increased the number of negative posts by 1.16% and decreased the number of positive posts by 1.19%.

Facebook
The researchers behind the new study analyzed over a billion anonymized status updates from more than 100 million Facebook users.
 

But the researchers were less interested in people's dislike of rain in general, and more in how one person's experience of rain could cause a ripple of negative feeling among people who were not currently being rained on.

A random variable such as the weather would allow the researchers to measure how the emotional tenor of one person's status updates negatively or positively influences the posts of their friends.

To make sure that it was the posts that were influencing mood, and that all the Facebook users were being rained on, the researchers restricted analysis to friends who were in different cities where there was no rain. And to make sure it was not the topic of rain that was the contagious element, they removed all weather-related status updates from their analysis. 
 
According to the study, the negative posts by the people in rainy cities influenced the posts of their finds in non-rainy cities. Each negative post would prompt another 1.29 negative posts from a user's friends.

Happy status updates are more 'contagious' than unhappy updates


If this sounds depressing, then there is an optimistic twist in the results. Happy status updates had a more powerful influence than unhappy posts. Each happy post would encourage an additional 1.75 happy updates from a user's friends.

"Our study suggests that people are not just choosing other people like themselves to associate with but actually causing their friends' emotional expressions to change," said lead author James Fowler, professor of political science in the Division of Social Sciences and of medical genetics in the School of Medicine at UC San Diego.

"We have enough power in this data set to show that emotional expressions spread online and also that positive expressions spread more than negative," he adds.

In fact, Fowler and his team believe that emotion is even more contagious online than their study was capable of measuring. 
 
"For our analysis," he says, "to get away from measuring the effect of the rain itself, we had to exclude the effects of posts on friends who live in the same cities. But we have a pretty good sense from other studies that people who live near each other have stronger relationships and influence each other even more. If we could measure those relationships, we would probably find even more contagion."

Fowler believes that the study's findings are significant in understanding - and therefore being able to manipulate - public well-being:
"If an emotional change in one person spreads and causes a change in many, then we may be dramatically underestimating the effectiveness of efforts to improve mental and physical health. We should be doing everything we can to measure the effects of social networks and to learn how to magnify them so that we can create an epidemic of well-being."
Recently, Medical News Today reported on a study examining the psychological effects of meeting Facebook or other social media contacts face to face for the first time.

Written by

Monday, March 10, 2014

While you may know how best to care for the health of your teeth, few often realize how best to care for the health of your bones - including those that compose your spine. Nutrition is certainly important. But it is high-impact exercises that allow bone mass to develop and now a new study begins to define how much bone-jarring force is a good thing.


Why High-Impact Exercise Is Good for Your Bones

Illustration by Ben Wiseman


This article appeared in the March 9, 2014 issue of The New York Times Magazine.

Bones should be jarred, for their own good. Past experiments have definitively established that subjecting bones to abrupt stress prompts them to add mass or at least reduces their loss of mass as people age. What has been in dispute, however, is how much force is needed to stimulate bone — and how to apply that force in daily life.

Recently researchers at the University of Bristol gathered male and female adolescents — the body accumulates bone mass rapidly at this time of life — and had them go about their daily routines while they wore activity monitors. The bone density of the volunteers’ hips was also measured.
 
A week later, the scientists reclaimed the monitors to check each teenager’s exposure to G forces­, a measure of impact. Those who experienced impacts of 4.2 G’s or greater — though these were infrequent — had notably sturdier hipbones. Additional work done by the same researchers showed that running a 10-minute mile or jumping up onto and down from a box at least 15 inches high was needed to produce forces that great. The significance of these findings is that people should probably run pretty fast or jump high to generate forces great enough to help build bone.

Unfortunately, few older adults are likely to be doing so. In follow-up experiments, the same researchers equipped 20 women older than 60 with activity monitors and ran them through an aerobics class, several brief and increasingly brisk walks and a session of stepping onto and off a foot-high box. None of the women reached the 4-G threshold ­— none, in fact, generated more than 2.1 G’s of force at any point during the various exercises.
 
The implications are somewhat concerning. Dr. Jon Tobias, a professor of rheumatology at the University of Bristol who led the experiments, says that while impacts that produce fewer than 4 G’s of force may help adults maintain bone mass — a possibility that he and his colleagues are exploring in ongoing experiments — it’s unclear what level of force below 4 G’s is needed.

So, Dr. Tobias says, young people and healthy adults should probably pound the ground, at least sometimes. Sprint. Jump off a box 15 inches or higher at your gym and jump back up. Hop in place. A study by other researchers published in January found that women between 25 and 50 who hopped at least 10 times twice a day, with 30 seconds between each hop, significantly increased their hipbone density after four months. Another group of subjects, who hopped 20 times daily, showed even greater gains.

Alas, a kind of Catch-22 confronts older individuals who have not been engaging in high-impact exercise: Their bodies and bones may not be capable of handling the types of activity most likely to improve bone health. Dr. Tobias and his colleagues hope to better understand what level of impact will benefit these people. In the meantime, anyone uncertain about the state of his or her bones should consult a physician before undertaking high-impact exercise (a caveat that also applies to those with a history of joint problems, including arthritis). For his part, Dr. Tobias says, “I plan to keep running until my joints wear out.”

Friday, March 7, 2014

Drink beer to recover from your workout? Heresy! But, a new "recovery ale" is being worked on that takes advantage of beer's natural food base while altering its electrolyte content so that beer would help hydrate instead of dehydrate. Well, you know it has to happen sooner or later.


Beer As A Post-Workout Recovery Drink? Not As Crazy As It Sounds

An ad for Vampt's Lean Machine "recovery ale," which will be marketed as a sports drink later this year, if funding allows. Researchers say drinking beer after working out has some advantages, but there are big caveats.
An ad for Vampt's Lean Machine "recovery ale," which will be marketed as a sports drink later this year, if funding allows. Researchers say drinking beer after working out has some advantages, but there are big caveats.  Courtesy of VAMPT 

 
There may be some good news brewing for fitness and beer enthusiasts: Somewhere in the north, a Canadian beverage company has concocted a low-alcohol, protein-packed "fit beer" that is expected to be marketed as a sports drink later this year, if funding allows.

The so-called "recovery ale," created by a team of food scientists at Vampt, touts itself as a healthy alternative to traditional ales, with only 77 calories and 0.5 percent alcohol by volume. And it's supposedly enriched with nutrients, antioxidants and electrolytes to help replenish the body after a good workout.

The idea, says Vampt founder Ian Toews, is to create a beverage that aligns with the active lifestyles of young beer lovers, while promoting responsible drinking.

"We just thought that maybe we could do something that would support a drinker, make it still socially fun, and help them accomplish what needs to be accomplished after an aggressive workout," he says.

We wondered what science had to say about this seemingly contradictory, but nonetheless appealing, pairing. Can beer really join the ranks of Gatorade and Powerade to become the next go-to sports drink?

Turns out, the idea isn't as farfetched as it might seem.

You see, when we exercise, our body gets sapped of some key components. We lose fluid and electrolytes through sweat as the body tries to cool down. We also draw down our small stores of carbohydrates and proteins as we put our muscles to work. By the end of the workout, our body needs to get all those things back to recover.

This is where sports drinks come in. They're full of carbs, sodium and all sorts of nutrients to keep our bodies hydrated and energized during and after exercise. And beer may be able to do that, too — if formulated the right way, says , a sports nutritionist at Griffith University in Australia.

Beer itself contains a small amount of carbohydrates and electrolytes, he says. It's not enough to do your body any good after exercise, but researchers like Desbrow have been experimenting with ways to reformulate beer so it'll have the properties of a sports drink without the dehydrating effects of alcohol.

In a published last December in the International Journal of Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, he and his colleagues found that beer's dehydrating effect can be weakened by changing its electrolyte content — a good first step into turning ale into a sports beverage.

By lowering the level of alcohol by volume to 2.3 percent and adding salt, they found that the manipulated beer actually hydrated their sample of athletes better than traditional ale.

Plus, he adds, since beer is plant based — the key ingredients, aside from water, are barley, hops and yeast — it contains a whole range of naturally occurring nutrients that manufactured sports drinks don't have.

"A properly formulated beer beverage is likely to do you no more harm than you are likely to get from a sports drink," Desbrow says. "In fact, it probably is likely to do you more good, because it's got a lot of these sort of natural compounds, like polyphenols, that are actually good for your health."

He's talking about compounds found in plants that are believed to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects. A 2011 in Germany suggested that polyphenols in beer may be especially useful for those who go through prolonged strenuous exercise, which tends to lower the body's immune function.

In the study, those who were given nonalcoholic beer every day for three weeks before and two weeks after a marathon reported fewer incidences of upper respiratory tract infections and were up to three times less susceptible to the common cold.

So that's the good news. The caveat is that for beer to be a good sports drink, you'll have to lose most of the alcohol. And the reasons go beyond just dehydration.

For one, excessive amounts of alcohol can impair protein synthesis, the process by which your muscles repair themselves after exercise, according to a published last month in PLoS One.

"It impairs some of what we call the protein signaling molecules in the body. These are the traffic lights that turn on protein synthesis," says , an exercise and nutrition researcher at Australian Catholic University, who led the study. "[Alcohol] dims the traffic light signals. So ultimately, that whole muscle protein synthesis is slowed down."

His study found that when athletes binged on alcohol after an intensive strength-training workout, their protein synthesis decreased by nearly 40 percent.

Now, the athletes in Hawley's study did a lot of drinking: They consumed roughly eight shots of vodka mixed with orange juice over a three-hour period. Hawley says it's not clear how more moderate drinking affects the recovery process, but "my guess is that any alcohol impedes it a little bit."

So how will a low-alcohol beer like Vampt's Lean Machine ale fare in the market? Hawley notes that consumers haven't always embraced drinks that mimic alcoholic favorites without the buzz. In the 1970s, he says, a whiskey-like, non-alcoholic beverage called hit the shelves in New Zealand.
"It lasted on the market three years," Hawley says. "So there's your answer to that."

But Vampt's Toews says he's not too worried. His company is in the midst of consumer taste tests for its recovery ale in Canada, and "Canadians know what a good beer is," he says.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

The best advice for well-being and good health that anyone could receive is summed up in a Washington Post article. We can talk about how we eat, regular check-ups, taking vitamins, but what it really comes down to is....just move.


Lenny Bernstein
Lenny Bernstein
MisFits columnist

5 years of fitness reporting, and 1 lesson: Just move

(Astrid Riecken/ FOR THE WASHINGTON POST ) - Wearing an Arnold Schwarzenegger t-shirt, Max
By , Published: March 4  
 
After five years of studying the scientific literature on fitness and health, wading through countless government reports, interviewing experts and trying every form of exercise I could, it’s pretty sobering to realize that the entire endeavor can be reduced to two words:
Just move.

I’m serious. If you’re reading this sitting down, stand up. When you’re done, go for a walk. Dance. Run. Jump. Ride a bike. Swim. Do some yoga. Do gymnastics. Play basketball. Play softball. Play tennis. Wrestle. Skate.

Do something — for at least 30 minutes a day, five days a week, if you’re an adult.
It doesn’t matter how old you are. Or how out of shape. Or, usually, whether you have other infirmities, including arthritis or cardiovascular problems.

Just move.

When I joined Vicky Hallett in writing this column nearly five years ago, I knew, of course, that we had a serious national health problem caused, in part, by the simple fact that we no longer move our bodies the way nature intended. A third of U.S. adults, including me, are overweight. Another 35.7 percent are obese. And 6.3 percent are extremely obese.

Folks, that doesn’t leave many of us in the healthy category.

You can quibble with the Body Mass Index, which, as I’ve said before, was probably devised by the same people who calculate how much money you’re going to need in retirement. You can, and should, eat healthfully, minimizing your intake of fats and sugars and loading up on vegetables and whole grains. You definitely need a consistently good night’s sleep.

But in the end, those aren’t as critical as getting some exercise. Mortality rates from all causes decline sharply as people become more fit, according to studies, even when age, smoking habits, cholesterol level, blood pressure, blood sugar levels and parental history of heart disease are taken into account.

And, yes, diligence about exercise isn’t enough if you’re seated in front of a computer all day, as I am. One of the more startling moments of the past five years came when I started to read the research on the number of hours many of us spend sedentary. It turns out that is endangering our health, too.

Of course, this affects your cardiovascular system, but a study just last month showed that for people 60 and older, each hour per day spent sitting increases your chances of disability significantly. 
 
Very recently, there have been signs of progress, especially among children. None is more encouraging than last week’s government report that showed a 43 percent decline in the obesity rate for kids ages 2 to 5. But the same data showed that overall obesity rates were unchanged, and for women older than 60, they rose 21 percent.

So, as I said, just move.

Why have I picked today to be so annnoooyyying, as my 16-year-old would put it? This is my last MisFits column. Soon, I’m going to debut a new health, wellness and fitness blog for The Post, an opportunity to extend my nagging to your overall well-being, not just your physical fitness. I’ll continue to write about that frequently, of course, but someone else will pick up here.

Which gives me one last chance to emphasize the two concepts I hope you’ve taken from my five years in this job:

If I can do it, you can do it. I’m 55, slow, generally unathletic and, as I said, overweight. It doesn’t matter. I’ve run 50 miles, biked to work, rappelled down a building and tried out to be a Nationals’ Racing President, to name a few of my efforts. Yes, The Post was paying me a modest sum to do so. But really all it takes is commitment and perseverance.

The more amazing takeaway is that in your neighborhood, maybe right on your block, ordinary people are doing some extraordinary things to keep themselves fit. I’ve got to start with Ray Clark, the 102-year-old gym rat I interviewed last year, and his 70-year-old physical trainer, Thom Hunter. Then there was 70-year-old Dan Durante, destroying all challengers in two pull-up contests. Frank Fumich, completing a Triple Ironman on a five-mile stretch of asphalt. Ed Keller, running a 6:14 marathon on a high school track in 89-degree heat. The 20 men and one woman who completed the 12-hour, overnight GoRuck challenge. The women who play basketball each week without keeping score. And Prince of Petworth blogger Dan Silverman, who walks 50 miles a week.
 
There are many more, too many to mention, whose efforts deserve our admiration and imitation. But from all of them, the lesson is the same.

Just move.