One Twin Exercises, the Other Doesn’t
By Gretchen Reynolds
Identical twins in
Finland who shared the same sports and other physical activities as
youngsters but different exercise habits as adults soon developed quite
different bodies and brains, according to a fascinating new study that
highlights the extent to which exercise shapes our health, even in
people who have identical genes and nurturing.
Determining the
precise, long-term effects of exercise is surprisingly difficult. Most
large-scale exercise studies rely on questionnaires or interviews and
medical records to establish the role of exercise. But these
epidemiological studies, while important and persuasive, cannot prove
that exercise causes health changes, only that people who exercise tend
to be healthier than those who do not.
To prove that exercise
directly causes a change in people’s bodies, scientists must mount
randomized controlled trials, during which one group of people works out
while a control group does not. But these experiments are complicated
and costly and, even in the best circumstances, cannot control for
volunteers’ genetics and backgrounds.
And genetics and
upbringing matter when it comes to exercise. Genes affect our innate
endurance capacity, how well we respond to different types of exercise,
and whether we enjoy working out at all. Childhood environment also
influences all of this, muddying the results of even well-conducted
exercise experiments.
All of this makes
identical twins so valuable. By definition, these pairs have the same
DNA. If they were raised in the same household, they also had similar
upbringing. So they can provide a way to study the effects of changes in
lifestyle among people with the same genes and pasts.
Some past studies had
found that older identical twins whose workout habits had diverged over
the years tended to age differently, with greater risks of poor health
and early death among the sedentary twin.
But no studies had looked at young twins and the impacts of different exercise routines on their health. So for the new study, which was published this month in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise,
researchers at the University of Jyvaskyla and other institutions in
Finland turned to that country’s extensive FinnTwin16 database, which
contained twins’ answers to questionnaires about their health and
medical conditions, beginning when the pairs were 16 and repeated every
few years afterward.
The researchers were
looking for young adult identical twins in their early- to mid-20s whose
exercise habits had substantially diverged after they had left their
childhood homes. These twins were not easy to find. Most of the pairs
had maintained remarkably similar exercise routines, despite living
apart.
But eventually the
researchers homed in on 10 pairs of male identical twins, one of whom
regularly exercised, while the other did not, usually because of work or
family pressures, the researchers determined.
The dissimilarities in their exercise routines had mostly begun within the past three years, according to their questionnaires.
The scientists invited
these twins into the lab and measured each young man’s endurance
capacity, body composition and insulin sensitivity, to determine their
fitness and metabolic health. The scientists also scanned each twin’s
brain.
Then they compared the twins’ results.
It turned out that
these genetically identical twins looked surprisingly different beneath
the skin and skull. The sedentary twins had lower endurance capacities,
higher body fat percentages, and signs of insulin resistance, signaling
the onset of metabolic problems. (Interestingly, the twins tended to
have very similar diets, whatever their workout routines, so food
choices were unlikely to have contributed to health differences.)
The twins’ brains also
were unalike. The active twins had significantly more grey matter than
the sedentary twins, especially in areas of the brain involved in motor
control and coordination.
Presumably, all of
these differences in the young men’s bodies and brains had developed
during their few, brief years of divergent workouts, underscoring how
rapidly and robustly exercising — or not — can affect health, said Dr.
Urho Kujala, a professor of sports and exercise medicine at the
University of Jyvaskyla who oversaw the study.
Of course, the study was small and not a formal randomized trial, although it involved identical twins.
But Dr. Kujala said he
believes that the results strongly imply that the differences in the
twin’s exercise habits caused the differences in their bodies.
More subtly, the
findings also point out that genetics and environment “do not have to
be” destiny when it comes to exercise habits, Dr. Kujala said. For these
particular twins, whether their genes and childhoods nudged them toward
exercising regularly or slumping on the couch, one of the pair overcame
that legacy and did the opposite (for better and worse).
The rest of us can do
likewise, Dr. Kujala said. Even if the input from our DNA and upbringing
urges us to skip the gym, we can “move more,” he said, and, based on
this study, rapidly and substantially improve the condition of our
bodies and brains.
No comments:
Post a Comment