Why Vitamins May Be Bad for Your Workout
By GRETCHEN REYNOLDS
Many people take vitamins as part of their
daily fitness regimens, having heard that antioxidants aid physical
recovery and amplify the impact of workouts. But in another example of
science undercutting deeply held assumptions, several new experiments
find that antioxidant supplements may actually reduce the benefits of
training.
Antioxidants became popular dietary
supplements largely because they were said to sop up free radicals, the
highly reactive oxygen molecules that are generated during daily
activities. Physical exertion, through its breakdown of oxygen, results
in the creation of large numbers of these molecules, which, in excess,
can lead to cell death and tissue damage. So it seems logical that
reducing the number of free radicals produced by exercise would be
desirable.
Enter antioxidants, which absorb and
deactivate free radicals. While the body creates its own antioxidants,
until recently many researchers believed that we produce too few natural
antioxidants to counteract the depredations from free radicals created
during exercise. So many people who exercise began downing large doses
of antioxidants such as vitamins C and E, even though few experiments in
people had actually examined the precise physiological impacts of
antioxidant supplements in people who work out.
For a study published last week in The Journal of Physiology,
researchers with the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences in Oslo and
other institutions gathered 54 healthy adult men and women, most of them
recreational runners or cyclists, and conducted a series of tests,
including muscle biopsies, blood draws and treadmill runs, to establish
their baseline endurance capacity and the cellular health of their
muscles.
Then they divided the volunteers into two
groups. Those in one group took four pills a day, delivering a total
dose of 1,000 milligrams of vitamin C and 235 milligrams of vitamin E.
Members of the second group got identical placebo pills.
Finally, they asked all of the participants
to complete a vigorous 11-week training program, consisting of
increasingly intense interval sessions once or twice per week, together
with two weekly sessions of moderately paced hour-long runs. By the end,
all of the volunteers were more fit than they had been at the start,
with their maximum endurance capacity increasing by an average of about 8
percent.
But their bodies had responded quite
differently to the training. The runners who had swallowed the placebo
pills showed robust increases of biochemical markers that are known to
goose the creation of mitochondria, the tiny structures within cells
that generate energy, in cells in their bloodstream and muscles. More
mitochondria, especially in muscle cells, means more energy and, by and
large, better health and fitness. The creation of new mitochondria is,
in fact, generally held to be one of the most important effects of
exercise.
But the volunteers who had consumed the
antioxidants had significantly lower levels of the markers related to
mitochondrial creation. The researchers didn’t actually count the
specific populations of mitochondria within their volunteers’ muscles
cells, but presumably, over time, those taking the antioxidants would
see a smaller uptick in mitochondrial density than among those not
taking them.
That finding echoes the results of another study of antioxidant supplementation and exercise, also published last year in The Journal of Physiology,
in which half of a group of older men downed 250 milligrams daily of
the supplement resveratrol, an antioxidant famously found in red wine,
and the other half took a placebo. After two months of exercising, the
men taking the placebo showed significant and favorable changes in their
blood pressure, cholesterol profiles and arteries, with fewer evident
arterial plaques.
The men taking the resveratrol were not as
fortunate. They had exercised as much as the other men, but their blood
pressures, cholesterol levels and arteries had remained stubbornly
almost unchanged.
Why and how antioxidant supplements would
blunt the effects of exercise is not altogether clear, said Goran
Paulsen, a researcher at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, who led
the vitamin C and E study. But he and many other physiologists have
begun to suspect that free radicals may play a different role during and
after exercise than previously thought.
In this theory, free radicals are not
villainous but serve as messengers, nudging genes and other bodily
systems into starting the various biochemical reactions that end in
stronger muscles and better metabolic health. Without free radicals,
those reactions don’t begin.
And large doses of antioxidant supplements absorb most of the free radicals produced by exercise.
Of course, that theory is still
unsubstantiated and requires long-term testing in people, Dr. Paulsen
said. It is possible, he said, that smaller doses of antioxidants or
different formulations might be useful for athletes. Meanwhile, natural
antioxidants from food sources, such as blueberries and red wine, are
unlikely to be problematic, he said. “It’s probably only concentrated
extracts that are potentially dangerous,” he said. It is also worth
pointing out that the volunteers who took the concentrated extracts of
vitamins C and E increased their endurance to the same extent as those
taking a placebo.
On the other hand, the supplements did not
improve performance in comparison with a placebo, so why bother with
them, Dr. Paulsen asked. “Personally, I would avoid high dosages” of
antioxidants while training, he said. The science on the topic may not
be complete, but the intimation of the recent studies is that by downing
the supplements, “you risk losing some of the benefits of exercise.”
No comments:
Post a Comment